Tag Archives: Google Play

Apple TV, Roku, watch your backs. There’s a new dongle in town. Chromecast.

Chromecast dongle

One of my colleagues, Salvador Risk (not his real name), is an avowed Google fanatic.

Google Glass, Chromebook, Jellybean. If Google makes it, he lauds it.

Invariably, whenever there’s a Google announcement or milestone, he shoots a link over IM for us to check out.

It was he who recommended that we watch the hellacious Google 1/0 2013.

My eyes are still bleeding.

We usually mock him for being so devout a disciple.

Yesterday was no exception.

You see yesterday, in his typical zeal, he shot us a link for some new innocuous Google product.

Followed by the statement (and I quote) “i so want this” (lowercase “i” and all).

Of course, we mocked him mercilessly, once again.

Who the heck would want “this” stupid thing?

“This” is another attempt by Google to stick it’s tentacles where they don’t belong.

“This” (we opined) would go the way of many of Google’s other lame-brained, ill-fated, poorly executed schemes.

What was “this”?

“This” was Chromecast.

What the heck is Chromecast, you ask?

Well it’s a dongle which will allow you to stream content from your phone, tablet or laptop, directly to your TV.

Simply plug Chromecast into an HDMI port of your HDTV, and voila! You’re streaming.

Chromecast in your TV

Even though the Chromecast dongle isn’t available yet (it’s available for pre-order in the Google Play store), it’s already making waves.

Why all the commotion, you ask?

For one, it’s not a box.

It’s a…dongle.

Unlike other set top box makers, like Apple and Roku (among the more recognizable names in the game), Chromecast won’t take up any space on your TV stand.

It’s just a simple fob that plugs in discretely to your TV.

Which means no power cords or HDMI cables.

With Chromecast, there’s nothing to hide, tuck away or get tangled in.

Actually, there is a little cord, which plugs into a micro USB port in the top of the dongle…but it’s not a big cord.

Second, you don’t need a remote control.

Virtually every other set top box is manipulated by some additional piece of hardware.

But not with Chromebook.

Your Android, iPhone or tablet device serves as your remote.

Third, Chromecast provide much of the same utility of other set top boxes.

Like Apple TV and Roku, Chromecast lets you grab content from Netflix and YouTube.

But they also let you access content from your Google Play account (like iTunes/iPhoto) and the Chrome browser.

But wait! That’s not all.

Lest you think that Chromecast is just some dumb portal that simply lets you stream what’s on your device to your TV, Google claims that Chromecast will also automatically update apps.

And if they’re going after Apple and Roku, I can see the available list of options growing in short order.

Finally, and more (or most) importantly, there’s the cost.

Chromecast is only $35.

That’s way below Apple’s $99 price point.

And significantly less than Roku’s $49.99 streaming player.

In the final analysis, even though we were originally ribbing Salvator (not his real name) mercilessly for his blind allegiance to Google, we had to concede that he was really onto something.

Call me gullible (and a nerd), but I’m kinda excited for the release of Chromecast.

As someone who rocks with Apple TV, I’m interested to see how Chromecast stacks up.

Anyway, nerdfest over.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled life.

1 Comment

Filed under technology

Clap for your app. Applause gives app developers a helping hand.

Applause

Do you want to know how your app stacks up against other apps?

Or even previous versions of your own app?

Then pay attention.

There’s a new app rating service called Applause, which lets you do just that.

Applause is the brainchild of a Boston-based uTest (known for getting their tech on).

To hear them describe it:

Applause is an app analytics product that crawls every rating and review from the top app stores. Applause synthesizes this mountain of user feedback into an easy-to-consume Applause Score to measure user satisfaction, app quality and how much applause an app is earning from users.

Its been compared to Klout, the social media influence ranking service.

But, in my opinion (outside of the 0-100 scale – more on that later) it’s actually more like Alexa, in that it ranks mobile applications far more objectively.

Apps are given a score (like Klout) between 0 and 100.

The greater the score, the better the app.

Scores are tabulated from the more than 50 million ratings, reviews and comments left by users in the App and Google Play stores.

The Applause score is actually comprised of ten different attributes, which include things like price, content, usability and ‘elegance’.

What are these "attributes" you speak of?

What are these “attributes” you speak of?

If you want to get an in-depth understanding of how Applause Scores are generated, check out their Behind the Scenes page, which discusses how attributes are weighted and applied.

For consumers, Applause can help you determine whether an app is worth the download.

Too often, developers send ‘ringers’ in to artificially inflate an app’s star rating.

Worse still, are the fake reviews of users lauding an app.

Applause claims that it provides a more even-handed, objective review of an app.

Kind of like the way Rotten Tomatoes provides objective, even-handed reviews of movies.

I set up a free account and took Applause for a test spin, and was fairly impressed with what I saw.

Setting up was as simple as entering an email address and choosing a password.

From there, I searched for an app, double-clicked the result which opened up a dashboard.

The Applause dashboard provide a snapshot as well as in-depth views of an app in six categories or areas:

  • Applause Score
  • Applause Attributes
  • Applause Signals
  • Review Stream
  • Tag Cloud
  • App Basics

For developers, Applause provides a bright line test of their app’s true appeal.

If your app wasn’t properly vetted or Beta tested, you might not know how crappy (or awesome) your app really is.

Applause lets you see your app’s overall rating, but also a tag cloud of the keywords most often associated with the app.

More importantly, Applause provides meaningful insight and direction about how to improve user satisfaction and overall app quality.

If you’re curious, I’d definitely recommend that you check out your app and see if it generates any Applause.

Get it?

I crack myself up.

2 Comments

Filed under apps, mobile

Is Google Play the App Store Killer?

Will Google Play unseat the champion?

Google is trying to dethrone Apple for dominance in the app market.

Although Android’s smartphone marketshare far exceeds that of Apple (I think it’s currently approaching 50%), Google’s app store has not seen a commensurate level of success.

The iTunes App Store continues to dwarf the Android App store, and Google is looking to change that.

Yesterday, FierceMobileContent reported that Google is about to scrap the Android app store in favor of Google Play, which is being positioned to compete more effectively with Apple.

Google Play will be a combination of the Android App Market, Google Music and Google’s eBookstore, effectively mirroring Apple’s App Store, iTunes and iBook offerings.

Google Play will give users the ability to access all of their content in the cloud, from any of their connected devices.

Here’s a short video from Google’s blog (obtusely) promoting Google Play.

The video is a well-crafted pitch, but the absence of a real-life demonstration of their offering left me scratching my head.

With iCloud purportedly providing the same level of capability (seamless access to your content across multiple devices, etc.), Google Play is definitely designed to be a head-to-head competitor.

According to Google, current Android App Market customers will be upgraded to Google Play over the course of the next few days.

As an Applephile or Apple purist, I’m simply not convinced that Google Play (or anything Android-related for that matter) can hold a candle to Apple.

Having handled an Android device or two in my day, I can definitively say that the user experience leaves much to be desired.

Perhaps Google Play will create a more seamless experience for Android users –  at least as it relates to accessing and interacting with their content – but I doubt it.

Either way, I’m not sure that this move will really make Google any more competitive in the app market.

As they say, you can lead a horse to water…

…but can you make them download more apps?

Hey, what do I know?

If you’re an Android user, I’d love to hear if this announcement excites you (or not) and how Google Play will (or won’t) impact you.

5 Comments

Filed under apps, branding, mobile, technology